H1000 is on my want listing of powders in addition. Probably the IMR Enduron sequence will likely be effectively appreciated and I can shift to that for improved availability.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's a shorter grain size, thus, the designation SC or quick Slash. The shorter, far more compact kernels allow the powder to flow from the powder measures far more smoothly, helping to ease the constant slicing of granules.

What's the main difference? Compression. With no Intense/weighty compression connected to the extended grain 7828, the stress curve was altered and the load fell aside.

Sweet!! I'll pick some up and provides it a try. Thanks fellas, I take pleasure in it! I will Permit you to know very well what I find out. I do have a few 50 percent pound of 4350 I'm able to try out that very first and find out what takes place.

Yup or it will not operate perfectly. And since the OP features a load making use of Varget I would test to uncover an individual to trade with. Could think of a earn gain situation.

Did you at any time try H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Shooting 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with common chamber. Thinking what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have got a limited provide of Varget, plus a large amount much more offered H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads Nearly solely, mainly because that may be what the rifles h4831 vs h4831sc shoot the most effective.

If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you might find a load that works OK Using the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were in excess of 70 grains would not stabilize in my rifle, which had the normal 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer h4831sc was the greatest bullet that might stabilize, nonetheless it did that superbly. It's a funny-looking bullet with a rounded nose profile, however it shoots wonderful and kills properly. Deer out to about one hundred fifty yards al went down straight away with rib-cage hits.

dioni.a.312 claimed: In my encounter the one real variation would be that the shortcut meters far better by reloading gear. Once It really is loaded theres no purposeful difference. I've listened to which the shortcut may have a small bit speedier burn charge but It appears insignificant. Click to develop...

Why would I point out this? Just what exactly is my level? I'm undecided that there is a genuine legitimate position apart from what's preferred with most hasn't been well-liked with me at all in these situation. Do I just Have got a powder jinx or anything? Just to tell you about how mad I really am, tomorrow I'm variety tests a buddies new .

This really is an more mature thread, you might not receive a response, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Remember to contemplate creating a new thread.

Indeed, You should use exactly the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, but the SC Model could permit you to get a bit additional in conditions where you are maxing out circumstance volume with the h4831sc typical powder just before achieving strain limits.

Although IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you will discover that in several occasions, exactly where one of these is mentioned another are going to be also. Also, you will find there is a reasonably constant romance between them with reference to stated loads.

IMR4831 and H4831SC are distinct. Where by you could be bewildering it and thinking that it can be close is H4831 and H4831SC are quite identical. Individuals two are practically exactly the same other than H4831SC is built to smaller sized grains so it meters much easier.